Development Partner Scorecard for GFATMdownload in english download in french

spinner Please wait, loading data…

Expected ResultsProgressOverall ResultsFurther Details

iconCommitments are documented and mutually agreed.

arrow The Global Fund acts as a financing mechanism and does not have in-country offices. Grants are awarded based on proposals developed by countries. Approved grants are implemented by country partners such as the government, civil society and the private sector. As the Global Fund is not an implementing entity, it does not sign in-country IHP+ compacts but send letters of support to countries which have signed them.

iconSupport is based on country plans & strategies, including to strengthen Health Systems.

tick The Global Fund provides financing in response to country-developed proposals. Applicants are strongly encouraged to align proposals with national health sector and disease strategies. All Global Fund financing should be additional to existing resources; requested financing should be used to close funding gaps. Countries can include technical assistance in their funding proposals, however, it is by default country owned, so this indicator is not applicable.
none
tick

iconFunding commitments are long-term.

cross Global Fund grants are provided over a period of 5 years (Phase 1 = 2 years; Phase 2 = 3 years). For this indicator, the Global Fund has provided data on disbursements relating to grants that were in Phase 2. In 2011, the Global Fund is simplifying its grant architecture by consolidating multiple grants for a single recipient and moving to fixed commitment cycles of up to three years, which will increase funding predictability.

iconFunds are disbursed predictably, as committed.

tick Where data were available, the Global Fund reported disbursing more than had been scheduled in the majority of countries (all except Djibouti, DRC and Mali). In some cases disbursements were more than 200% of scheduled amounts. Global Fund disbursements follow country performance, therefore actual disbursements do not match scheduled disbursements.

iconCountry systems for procurement & public financial management are used & strengthened.

tick On PFM, GF uses national systems partially in 5 countries and completely in 1 country; in 3 countries GF does not use national systems. All countries can include system-strengthening activities in funding proposals. In DRC, these indicators do not apply as the implementing agency is UNDP. On PIUs, the GF reports 0 because PIU staff & their TORs are decided on/appointed by the country.
tick
tick

iconResources are being managed for Development Results.

tick The Global Fund strongly manages for results through its performance-based funding principle. All grant agreements include performance frameworks that define time-bound targets over the grant life cycle. Funding is only disbursed when the country performance achieves self-set targets. The Global Fund requires that proposals are aligned with national strategies. Performance frameworks are therefore often based on national targets.

iconMutual accountability is being demonstrated.

none As a non-resident donor, the Global Fund does not conduct its own parallel assessments in-country. However, the Global Fund participates in country annual reviews with partners, if requested by the country. Under the new grant architecture, the Global Fund will provide implementers with the opportunity to align Global Fund reviews with country reviews to simplify the process.

iconCivil Society actively engaged.

arrow The Global Fund encourages civil society organizations to serve as Principal recipients for Global Fund financing. In 2007, the Global Fund disbursed roughly US$42 million to civil society Principal Recipients in the covered countries. In 2008, this amount increased to approximately US$57 million. Countries that have received civil society financing in the reporting period include Ethiopia, Mali, Nepal, Niger and Nigeria.

Agency Profile

The Global Fund is a unique public-private partnership dedicated to attracting and disbursing additional resources to prevent and treat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria and to strengthen health systems. Since its creation in 2002, the Global Fund has approved funding of US$ 21.7 billion for more than 600 programs in 150 countries.

Countries where GFATM is demonstrating progress

Countries where GFATM is reporting limited progress

This column shows a summary of the aggregated data that this agency has reported for each Standard Performance Measure, with a sense of progress between baseline and 2009.
Countries where agency has ratings of tick or arrow for the minority of standard performance measures.
These expected results summarise the commitments set out in the IHP+ Global Compact.
This section provides space for the agency to explain the results presented in their scorecard. Text was developed by the IHP+Results team based on data reported by the agency, and agreed in consultation with the agency.

Ratings are based on agreed criteria – for a full list of these criteria click here.

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Ratings shown are aggregates of each agency’s performance in the countries for which they provided data. For more information on how we calculated these aggregate ratings click here. To see disaggregated ratings (by country) click here.

This section provides space for the agency to explain the results presented in their scorecard.  Text was developed by the IHP+Results team based on data reported by the agency, and agreed in consultation with the agency.
This table shows all of the quantitative results for this country. Of the 10 Standard Performance Measures for IHP+ country governments, 5 required Yes/No answers and these are reported only the the scorecard (not in this call out).

The data table is copied into here by Javascript included in the header imported from the Django template (country_scorecards.html), replacing this entire div.

For more details on Country Government Standard Performance Measures click here.

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
1DP: Proportion of IHP+ countries in which the partner has signed commitment to (or documented support for) the IHP+ Country Compact, or equivalent agreement. 100% of IHP+ countries where the signatory operates have support for/commitment to the IHP+ compact (or equivalent) mutually agreed and documented.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
2DPa: Percent of aid flows to the health sector that is reported on national health sector budgets. Halve the proportion of aid flows to the health sector not reported on government’s budget(s) (with ≥ 85% reported on budget).
2DPb: Percent of current capacity-development support provided through coordinated programmes consistent with national plans/strategies for the health sector. 50% or more of capacity development support to each IHP+ country in which the signatory operates are based on national health sector plans/strategies
2DPc: Percent of health sector aid provided as programme based approaches. 66% of health sector aid flows are provided in the context of programme based approaches

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
3DP: Percent of health sector aid provided through multiyear commitments. 90% (or an equivalent published target) of health sector funding provided through multi-year commitments (min. 3 years).

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
4DP: Percent of health sector aid disbursements released according to agreed schedules in annual or multi-year frameworks. 90% of health sector aid disbursed within the fiscal year for which it was scheduled.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
5DPa: Percent of health sector aid that uses country procurement systems. Reduce by one-third the aid not using procurement systems (with ≥ 80% using country systems).
5DPb: Percent of health sector aid that uses public financial management systems. Reduce by one-third the aid not using public financial management systems (with ≥ 80% using country systems).
5DPc: Number of parallel Project Implementation Units (PIUs) per country. Reduce by two-thirds the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs).

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
6DP: Proportion of countries in which agreed, transparent and monitorable performance assessment frameworks are being used to assess progress in the health sector. Single national performance assessment frameworks are used, where they exist, as the primary basis to assess progress in all countries where the signatory operates.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
7DP: Proportion of countries where mutual assessments have been made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness. Annual mutual assessment of progress in implementing health sector commitments & agreements (such as the IHP+ country compact and on aid effectiveness in the health sector) is being made in all the countries where the signatory operates.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
8DP: Evidence of support for Civil Society to be actively represented in health sector policy processes – including health sector planning, coordination & review mechanisms. All signatories can provide some evidence of supporting active civil society engagement in 100% of IHP+ countries in which they are active.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Standard Performance Measure

1DP: Proportion of IHP+countries in which the partner has signed commitment to (or documented support for) the IHP+ Country Compact, or equivalent agreement.

Target

100% of IHP+ countries where the signatory operates have support for/commitment to the IHP+ compact (or equivalent) mutually agreed and documented.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

2DPa: Percent of aid flows to the health sector that is reported on national health sector budgets.

Target

Halve the proportion of aid flows to the health sector not reported on government’s budget(s) (with ≥ 85% reported on budget).

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

2DPb: Percent of current capacity-development support provided through coordinated programmes consistent with national plans/strategies for the health sector.

Target

50% or more of capacity development support to each IHP+ country in which the signatory operates are based on national health sector plans/strategies

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

2DPc: Percent of health sector aid provided as programme based approaches.

Target

66% of health sector aid flows are provided in the context of programme based approaches.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

3DP: Percent of health sector aid provided through multiyear commitments.

Target

90% (or an equivalent published target) of health sector funding provided through multi-year commitments (min. 3 years).

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

4DP: Percent of health sector aid disbursements released according to agreed schedules in annual or multi-year frameworks.

Target

90% of health sector aid disbursed within the fiscal year for which it was scheduled.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

5DPa: Percent of health sector aid that uses country procurement systems.

Target

Reduce by one-third the aid not using procurement systems (with ≥ 80% using country systems).

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

5DPb: Percent of health sector aid that uses public financial management systems.

Target

Reduce by one-third the aid not using public financial management systems (with ≥ 80% using country systems).

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

5DPc: Number of parallel Project Implementation Units (PIUs) per country.

Target

Reduce by two-thirds the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs).

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

6DP: Proportion of countries in which agreed, transparent and monitorable performance assessment frameworks are being used to assess progress in the health sector.

Target

Single national performance assessment frameworks are used, where they exist, as the primary basis to assess progress in all countries where the signatory operates.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

7DP: Proportion of countries where mutual assessments have been made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness.

Target

Annual mutual assessment of progress in implementing health sector commitments & agreements (such as the IHP+ country compact and on aid effectiveness in the health sector) is being made in all the countries where the signatory operates.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

8DP: Evidence of support for Civil Society to be actively represented in health sector policy processes – including health sector planning, coordination & review mechanisms.

Target

All signatories can provide some evidence of supporting active civil society engagement in 100% of IHP+ countries in which they are active.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress
Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
1G: IHP+ Compact or equivalent mutual agreement in place. An IHP+ Compact or equivalent mutual agreement is in place.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
2Ga: National Health Sector Plans/Strategy in place with current targets & budgets that have been jointly assessed. A National Health Sector Plan/Strategy is in place with current targets & budgets that have been jointly assessed.
2Gb: Costed and evidence- based HRH plan in place that is integrated with the national health plan. A costed, comprehensive national HRH plan (integrated with the health plan) is being implemented or developed.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
3G: Proportion of public funding allocated to health. 15% (or an equivalent published target) of the national budget is allocated to health.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
4G: Proportion of health sector funding disbursed against the approved annual budget. Halve the proportion of health sector funding not disbursed against the approved annual budget.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
5Ga: Country public financial management either (a) adhere to broadly accepted good practices or (b) have a reform programme in place to achieve these. Improvement of at least one measure (ie 0.5 points) on the PFM/CPIA scale of performance.
5Gb: Country procurement systems either (a) adhere to broadly accepted good practices or (b) have a reform programme in place to achieve these. Improvement of at least one measure on the four- point scale used to assess performance for this sector.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
6G: An agreed transparent and monitorable performance assessment framework is being used to assess progress in the health sector. A transparent and monitorable performance assessment framework is in place to assess progress in the health sector.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
7G: Mutual assessments, such as joint annual health sector reviews, have been made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness. Mutual assessments (such as a joint annual health sector review) are being made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
8G: Evidence that civil society is actively represented in health sector policy processes – including health sector planning, coordination & review mechanisms. At least 10% of seats in the country’s health sector coordination mechanisms are allocated to civil society representatives.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Standard Performance Measure

1G: IHP+ Compact or equivalent mutual agreement in place.

Target

An IHP+ Compact or equivalent mutual agreement is in place.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

2Ga: National Health Sector Plans/Strategy in place with current targets & budgets that have been jointly assessed.

Target

A National Health Sector Plan/Strategy is in place with current targets & budgets that have been jointly assessed.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

2Gb: Costed and evidence- based HRH plan in place that is integrated with the national health plan.

Target

A costed, comprehensive national HRH plan (integrated with the health plan) is being implemented or developed.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

3G: Proportion of public funding allocated to health.

Target

15% (or an equivalent published target) of the national budget is allocated to health.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

4G: Proportion of health sector funding disbursed against the approved annual budget.

Target

Halve the proportion of health sector funding not disbursed against the approved annual budget.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

5Ga: Country public financial management either (a) adhere to broadly accepted good practices or (b) have a reform programme in place to achieve these.

Target

Improvement of at least one measure (ie 0.5 points) on the PFM/CPIA scale of performance.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

5Gb: Country procurement systems either (a) adhere to broadly accepted good practices or (b) have a reform programme in place to achieve these.

Target

Improvement of at least one measure on the four- point scale used to assess performance for this sector.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

6G: An agreed transparent and monitorable performance assessment framework is being used to assess progress in the health sector.

Target

A transparent and monitorable performance assessment framework is in place to assess progress in the health sector.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

7G: Mutual assessments, such as joint annual health sector reviews, have been made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness.

Target

Mutual assessments (such as a joint annual health sector review) are being made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

8G: Evidence that civil society is actively represented in health sector policy processes – including health sector planning, coordination & review mechanisms.

Target

At least 10% of seats in the country’s health sector coordination mechanisms are allocated to civil society representatives.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress