Development Partner Scorecard for UKdownload in english download in french

spinner Please wait, loading data…

Expected ResultsProgressOverall ResultsFurther Details

iconCommitments are documented and mutually agreed.

tick In 2008-09, the UK signed a Compact in Nepal, Ethiopia and Mozambique. In February 2008, the UK signed an MoU with Government and 15 other development partners in Burundi. In December 2010, the UK signed a Compact in Nigeria.

iconSupport is based on country plans & strategies, including to strengthen Health Systems.

arrow The average scores mask wide variation in individual country scores. Where country conditions allow alignment is strong. 100% of support is on budget in Ethiopia and 98% in Mozambique. 100% of support in Nepal is programme-based and 93% in Ethiopia. The figure for both these indicators is 0% in both Burundi and Nigeria. The large size of DFID’s health programme in Nigeria in particular pulls down the average.
tick
arrow

iconFunding commitments are long-term.

tick The UK endeavours to make its funding long term and predictable. Mozambique and Nepal: UK health funding is for 5 years. In Ethiopia and Nigeria health funding is for 3 years.

iconFunds are disbursed predictably, as committed.

tick In Nigeria and Nepal disbursements were as committed. In Mozambique disbursements for the pooled sector budget support fund were as committed.

iconCountry systems for procurement & public financial management are used & strengthened.

arrow DFID’s average score masks wide variation. In Ethiopia and Mozambique, over 90% of DFID support uses country financial management systems. In Nepal, the use of sector budget support means that two-thirds of support uses country financial management systems. In Ethiopia, the share of DFID support using country procurement systems has risen from zero to 88% since 2007. In Burundi and Nigeria no DFID support uses country financial or procurement systems. In both cases, DFID provides technical assistance to strengthen national capacity.
tick
arrow

iconResources are being managed for Development Results.

tick In Burundi a unified health sector results framework was used for the first time during 2009; DFID’s bilateral programme indicators are drawn from this framework. In Mozambique the single national performance assessment framework is DFID’s sole tool for monitoring sector performance. In Nepal DFID has drawn all programme indicators from the second Nepal Health Sector Programme Implementation Plan (NHSP-IP 2) Results Framework.

iconMutual accountability is being demonstrated.

tick In Burundi the results framework includes some aid effectiveness indicators but all MoU commitments are not routinely assessed. A Compact will be developed during 2011, to include revised aid effectiveness commitments. In Nigeria the first review of the performance assessment framework took place in November 2010. In Mozambique a framework for monitoring MOU commitments has been developed in 2010 and will be used to monitor MOU (and IHP+) compliance on an annual basis – as part of the Annual Joint Evaluation process.

iconCivil Society actively engaged.

arrow Multicountry: In 2009/10 DFID provided £400,000 to support CSO engagement in national health policy. Nigeria: DFID supports CSOs at federal and state level, including the Health Reform Foundation of Nigeria – actively engaged in policy debate and a key agent behind the Health Bill. Nepal: DFID plan to support civil society capacity to use social accountability tools; future health funding will help civil society operate access equality surveys. Burundi: in 2009, DFID, as lead donor, facilitated CSO participation in sector group meetings and at the Joint Review.

Agency Profile

The Department for International Development (DFID): leading the UK government’s fight against world poverty. DFID works with national and international partners to eliminate global poverty and its causes.

Countries where UK is demonstrating progress

This column shows a summary of the aggregated data that this agency has reported for each Standard Performance Measure, with a sense of progress between baseline and 2009.
Countries where agency has ratings of tick or arrow for the minority of standard performance measures.
These expected results summarise the commitments set out in the IHP+ Global Compact.
This section provides space for the agency to explain the results presented in their scorecard. Text was developed by the IHP+Results team based on data reported by the agency, and agreed in consultation with the agency.

Ratings are based on agreed criteria – for a full list of these criteria click here.

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Ratings shown are aggregates of each agency’s performance in the countries for which they provided data. For more information on how we calculated these aggregate ratings click here. To see disaggregated ratings (by country) click here.

This section provides space for the agency to explain the results presented in their scorecard.  Text was developed by the IHP+Results team based on data reported by the agency, and agreed in consultation with the agency.
This table shows all of the quantitative results for this country. Of the 10 Standard Performance Measures for IHP+ country governments, 5 required Yes/No answers and these are reported only the the scorecard (not in this call out).

The data table is copied into here by Javascript included in the header imported from the Django template (country_scorecards.html), replacing this entire div.

For more details on Country Government Standard Performance Measures click here.

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
1DP: Proportion of IHP+ countries in which the partner has signed commitment to (or documented support for) the IHP+ Country Compact, or equivalent agreement. 100% of IHP+ countries where the signatory operates have support for/commitment to the IHP+ compact (or equivalent) mutually agreed and documented.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
2DPa: Percent of aid flows to the health sector that is reported on national health sector budgets. Halve the proportion of aid flows to the health sector not reported on government’s budget(s) (with ≥ 85% reported on budget).
2DPb: Percent of current capacity-development support provided through coordinated programmes consistent with national plans/strategies for the health sector. 50% or more of capacity development support to each IHP+ country in which the signatory operates are based on national health sector plans/strategies
2DPc: Percent of health sector aid provided as programme based approaches. 66% of health sector aid flows are provided in the context of programme based approaches

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
3DP: Percent of health sector aid provided through multiyear commitments. 90% (or an equivalent published target) of health sector funding provided through multi-year commitments (min. 3 years).

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
4DP: Percent of health sector aid disbursements released according to agreed schedules in annual or multi-year frameworks. 90% of health sector aid disbursed within the fiscal year for which it was scheduled.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
5DPa: Percent of health sector aid that uses country procurement systems. Reduce by one-third the aid not using procurement systems (with ≥ 80% using country systems).
5DPb: Percent of health sector aid that uses public financial management systems. Reduce by one-third the aid not using public financial management systems (with ≥ 80% using country systems).
5DPc: Number of parallel Project Implementation Units (PIUs) per country. Reduce by two-thirds the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs).

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
6DP: Proportion of countries in which agreed, transparent and monitorable performance assessment frameworks are being used to assess progress in the health sector. Single national performance assessment frameworks are used, where they exist, as the primary basis to assess progress in all countries where the signatory operates.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
7DP: Proportion of countries where mutual assessments have been made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness. Annual mutual assessment of progress in implementing health sector commitments & agreements (such as the IHP+ country compact and on aid effectiveness in the health sector) is being made in all the countries where the signatory operates.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
8DP: Evidence of support for Civil Society to be actively represented in health sector policy processes – including health sector planning, coordination & review mechanisms. All signatories can provide some evidence of supporting active civil society engagement in 100% of IHP+ countries in which they are active.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Standard Performance Measure

1DP: Proportion of IHP+countries in which the partner has signed commitment to (or documented support for) the IHP+ Country Compact, or equivalent agreement.

Target

100% of IHP+ countries where the signatory operates have support for/commitment to the IHP+ compact (or equivalent) mutually agreed and documented.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

2DPa: Percent of aid flows to the health sector that is reported on national health sector budgets.

Target

Halve the proportion of aid flows to the health sector not reported on government’s budget(s) (with ≥ 85% reported on budget).

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

2DPb: Percent of current capacity-development support provided through coordinated programmes consistent with national plans/strategies for the health sector.

Target

50% or more of capacity development support to each IHP+ country in which the signatory operates are based on national health sector plans/strategies

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

2DPc: Percent of health sector aid provided as programme based approaches.

Target

66% of health sector aid flows are provided in the context of programme based approaches.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

3DP: Percent of health sector aid provided through multiyear commitments.

Target

90% (or an equivalent published target) of health sector funding provided through multi-year commitments (min. 3 years).

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

4DP: Percent of health sector aid disbursements released according to agreed schedules in annual or multi-year frameworks.

Target

90% of health sector aid disbursed within the fiscal year for which it was scheduled.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

5DPa: Percent of health sector aid that uses country procurement systems.

Target

Reduce by one-third the aid not using procurement systems (with ≥ 80% using country systems).

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

5DPb: Percent of health sector aid that uses public financial management systems.

Target

Reduce by one-third the aid not using public financial management systems (with ≥ 80% using country systems).

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

5DPc: Number of parallel Project Implementation Units (PIUs) per country.

Target

Reduce by two-thirds the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs).

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

6DP: Proportion of countries in which agreed, transparent and monitorable performance assessment frameworks are being used to assess progress in the health sector.

Target

Single national performance assessment frameworks are used, where they exist, as the primary basis to assess progress in all countries where the signatory operates.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

7DP: Proportion of countries where mutual assessments have been made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness.

Target

Annual mutual assessment of progress in implementing health sector commitments & agreements (such as the IHP+ country compact and on aid effectiveness in the health sector) is being made in all the countries where the signatory operates.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

8DP: Evidence of support for Civil Society to be actively represented in health sector policy processes – including health sector planning, coordination & review mechanisms.

Target

All signatories can provide some evidence of supporting active civil society engagement in 100% of IHP+ countries in which they are active.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress
Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
1G: IHP+ Compact or equivalent mutual agreement in place. An IHP+ Compact or equivalent mutual agreement is in place.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
2Ga: National Health Sector Plans/Strategy in place with current targets & budgets that have been jointly assessed. A National Health Sector Plan/Strategy is in place with current targets & budgets that have been jointly assessed.
2Gb: Costed and evidence- based HRH plan in place that is integrated with the national health plan. A costed, comprehensive national HRH plan (integrated with the health plan) is being implemented or developed.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
3G: Proportion of public funding allocated to health. 15% (or an equivalent published target) of the national budget is allocated to health.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
4G: Proportion of health sector funding disbursed against the approved annual budget. Halve the proportion of health sector funding not disbursed against the approved annual budget.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
5Ga: Country public financial management either (a) adhere to broadly accepted good practices or (b) have a reform programme in place to achieve these. Improvement of at least one measure (ie 0.5 points) on the PFM/CPIA scale of performance.
5Gb: Country procurement systems either (a) adhere to broadly accepted good practices or (b) have a reform programme in place to achieve these. Improvement of at least one measure on the four- point scale used to assess performance for this sector.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
6G: An agreed transparent and monitorable performance assessment framework is being used to assess progress in the health sector. A transparent and monitorable performance assessment framework is in place to assess progress in the health sector.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
7G: Mutual assessments, such as joint annual health sector reviews, have been made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness. Mutual assessments (such as a joint annual health sector review) are being made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Measured using the following Standard Performance Measures (SPMs):

SPM Target
8G: Evidence that civil society is actively represented in health sector policy processes – including health sector planning, coordination & review mechanisms. At least 10% of seats in the country’s health sector coordination mechanisms are allocated to civil society representatives.

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Standard Performance Measure

1G: IHP+ Compact or equivalent mutual agreement in place.

Target

An IHP+ Compact or equivalent mutual agreement is in place.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

2Ga: National Health Sector Plans/Strategy in place with current targets & budgets that have been jointly assessed.

Target

A National Health Sector Plan/Strategy is in place with current targets & budgets that have been jointly assessed.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

2Gb: Costed and evidence- based HRH plan in place that is integrated with the national health plan.

Target

A costed, comprehensive national HRH plan (integrated with the health plan) is being implemented or developed.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

3G: Proportion of public funding allocated to health.

Target

15% (or an equivalent published target) of the national budget is allocated to health.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

4G: Proportion of health sector funding disbursed against the approved annual budget.

Target

Halve the proportion of health sector funding not disbursed against the approved annual budget.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

5Ga: Country public financial management either (a) adhere to broadly accepted good practices or (b) have a reform programme in place to achieve these.

Target

Improvement of at least one measure (ie 0.5 points) on the PFM/CPIA scale of performance.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

5Gb: Country procurement systems either (a) adhere to broadly accepted good practices or (b) have a reform programme in place to achieve these.

Target

Improvement of at least one measure on the four- point scale used to assess performance for this sector.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

6G: An agreed transparent and monitorable performance assessment framework is being used to assess progress in the health sector.

Target

A transparent and monitorable performance assessment framework is in place to assess progress in the health sector.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

7G: Mutual assessments, such as joint annual health sector reviews, have been made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness.

Target

Mutual assessments (such as a joint annual health sector review) are being made of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress

Standard Performance Measure

8G: Evidence that civil society is actively represented in health sector policy processes – including health sector planning, coordination & review mechanisms.

Target

At least 10% of seats in the country’s health sector coordination mechanisms are allocated to civil society representatives.

Criteria for Rating

Click here to see the criteria used to provide ratings against the measure(s) and target(s).

Target achieved
Making progress
No progress